Why is it OK to say "I was relieved to have passed my exam"?
it's not logical, as for me, because the first part is in Past simple and the second is Present Perfect, but not Past! could you please explain why it's so
6 answers from our tutors
Best answer
In your example "to have passed ..." is not Present Perfect Tense, it is an infinitive form - a perfect infinitive, which is not a tense. But you can rephrase it like this "I was relieved that I had passed my exam" if it sounds logical.
Because ''I was relieved'' is a passive clause, and ''to have passed'' means that it happened in near future, and you still feel the effect of passing the exam (the relief).
Yup we can use past simple and present perfect but ‘to have passed my exam’ is not even a caustive. You have to change the sentence.
Check your English level for free
Take our quick and free test to find out your current level of English
Start test
And I completely agree with the explanation of teacher Domingos👇👌
The most common way to say it is simply "I passed." You can also say "I've passed" or "I did pass." If you want to be more specific, you can say "I passed with a score of "
The sentence combines past simple and present perfect to convey a sequence of events: passing the exam happened first (present perfect), followed by the feeling of relief (past simple). This construction is grammatically correct and effectively expresses the chronological order of the events.
Other student questions
Best answer
Luke Anthony St-PierreQualified and Certified ESL teacher... Bilingual with 14 + years of experience
Its (without an apostrophe) is a possessive pronoun, like his or her. for nouns that don't have a defined gender. In contrast, It's (with an apostrophe) is the shortened form, or contraction, of it is or it has.
- "I could be a morning person, if morning happens around noon".
Let me hear you interpret this sentence 😊.
- What does "as above so below" mean?Sarrah
I met this phrase in the book and I was wondering about the meaning of "as above, so below." Here is the context where I met this phrase: In the meticulously designed garden, the arrangement of the flowers and paths reflected the harmony of the stars above, truly embodying the principle "as above, so below."
Best answer
It simply compares the harmony of the flowers to that of the stars... meaning same harmonous path the stars portray above (in the sky), it's same with the flowers below.
