The business dinner we had had had had a positive impact on our relationship. Is this correct?
The wonders of the English language
7 answers from our tutors
Actually there is no need for the comma as the clause ‘we had had’ is a defining reduced adjective clause. The dinner [we had had] had had an impact on our relationship. However, you can place the reduced adjective clause between two commas: The business dinner, we had had, had had a positive impact on our relationship. If you place one comma only, the sentence will be incorrect. 🌹🌹🌹🌹
Sounds strange. There are too many hads, I would simply restructure and punctuate the sentence. The business dinner we had, had a positive impact on our relationship.
Check your English level for free
Take our quick and free test to find out your current level of English
Start testAwkward but sounds strange because you're missing a comma. If you place a comma after the second had, then the sentence is reported speech but everything is in the past perfect - all of the action is complete way before the simple past (what I call the far/remote past). So the sentence should read: "The business dinner we had had, had had a positive impact on our relationship."
The correct answer is "The business dinner we had had a positive impact on our relationship.
Too many hads.
- LouiseDFun and patient guide for your journey to fluency!
I wouldn't say it's incorrect but it's a bit awkward with "had" three times in a row! I would just change the order around to say "We had had a business dinner that had a positive impact on our relationship" so it sounds smoother.
The business dinner we had, had a positive impact on our relationship.